Tuesday, December 29, 2009
GnRH Receptor Blockers fir Hormone Therapy
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor blockers (antagonists) are the latest addition to the hormonal therapy armamentarium for patients with prostate cancer. In contrast to the GnRH agonists, GnRH blockers have an immediate onset of action and do not cause an initial surge in testosterone levels that can lead to clinical flare in patients with advanced disease. Degarelix (Firmagon is a new GnRH blocker that has recently been approved by the EMEA and US FDA for the treatment of men with hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer. In this article, we briefly review the Phase III trial data for degarelix 240/80 mg (licensed dose) versus leuprolide 7.5 mg that led to these recent approvals.
Written by:
Boccon-Gibod L, Iversen P, Persson BE
Tumor antigens (TA) are promising candidates for targeted treatment of PCa.
The choice of the antigen in the dendritic cell-based vaccine therapy for prostate cancer - Abstract | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
Monday, 28 December 2009 | |
Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. Tumor antigens (TA) are promising candidates for targeted treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). Critical issues in the preparation of dendritic cell (DC)-based TA vaccines are the DC maturation state and the appropriateness of the TA. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate acide pshosphatase (PAP) presented by DC have produced encouraging results and PAP-loaded DCs are at late-stage development for PCa patients. TAs indispensable for tumor survival and propagation are now emerging as first choice TAs for future vaccines. The increased expression and enzymatic activity of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) by aggressive prostate tumors is indicative of a unique, selective advantage on the part of cells expressing them. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and survivin are both involved in tumor cell survival and considered universal TAs. The T cell epitope potential of peptides derived from these TAs has been defined by computer-assisted prediction programs and has been tested in vitro and in vivo in terms of their ability to recruit cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and to be recognised as CTL targets. Results, reviewed here, show that anti-tumor immunity can be induced in vivo by DC loaded with both whole TAs and TA peptides. The promising, but still limited clinical success suggests further exploration of this immune therapy in the more appropriate setting of minimal disease. In advanced stages, vaccine can still be effective when combined with systemic or local cytoreductive therapies, which may overcome antigen specific tolerance and subvert the tumor immunosuppressive environment. Written by: Reference: PubMed Abstract |
the survival disadvantage for black men with prostate cancer.
Tuesday, 29 December 2009 | |
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA. kensch@med.wayne.edu This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it To compare overall and prostate cancer-specific survival, using the Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data, among 8679 Detroit area black and white men with localized or regional stage prostate cancer diagnosed from 1988 to 1992 to determine whether racial disparities in long-term survival remained after adjusting for treatment type and socioeconomic status (SES). The cases were geocoded to the census block-group, and SES data were obtained from the 1990 U.S. Census. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio of death from any cause. The median follow-up was 16.5 years. Of the 7770 localized stage cases (22% black and 78% white) and 909 regional cases (24% black and 76% white), black men were more likely to receive nonsurgical treatment (P < .001) and to be of low SES (P < .0001). The survival analyses were stratified by stage. For both stages, black men had poorer survival than white men in the unadjusted model. The adjustment for age and tumor grade had little effect on the survival differences, but adjustment for SES and treatment removed the survival differences. Low SES and nonsurgical treatment were associated with a greater risk of death among men with prostate cancer, explaining much of the survival disadvantage for black men with prostate cancer. Written by: Reference: |
Sunday, December 27, 2009
t relapse-free survival was over 90% in patients treated with salvage radiotherapy (RT) plus
Researchers from the Mayo Clinic have reported that relapse-free survival was over 90% in patients treated with salvage radiotherapy (RT) plus two years of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for post-prostatectomy relapse. The details of this study were presented at the 2009 meeting of the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology in the first week in November, 2009.[1]
Previous studies have evaluated RT salvage therapy for men who failed radical prostatectomy. Patients who relapse after radical prostatectomy and receive radiation therapy have a variable prognosis that has been poorly defined in previous studies. In one review the outcomes of 501 men who had recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy and had received salvage radiation therapy were evaluated. It was reported that 50% of patients treated with salvage therapy after failing prostatectomy were alive without progression of disease with a median follow-up of almost four years. It was also reported that half the patients remained progression-free with a median follow-up of 45 months. Only 4% of patients had died of prostate cancer during this period of observation. In another study, researchers from M. D. Anderson Cancer Center reported that radiation therapy—with or without hormonal therapy—for men with biochemical failure following prostatectomy was effective salvage therapy. They reported that 84% of men with favorable characteristics and 62% with unfavorable characteristics had five-year control of PSA. Researchers from Johns Hopkins University and Duke University have reported that salvage radiotherapy following biochemical recurrence improves prostate cancer-specific survival in men with a PSA doubling time of less than six months.
The current study involved 75 men who had biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy who were treated with RT plus two years of ADT. These patients consisted of two groups:
- Group 1: Patients with a PSA relapse alone after having undetectable postoperative levels (n=46)
- Group 2: Patients with PSA relapse with clinically palpable or biopsy-proven recurrence (n=26)
The median follow-up in this study was 6.4 years:
- All patients achieved undetectable PSA levels.
- Relapse-free survival and freedom from PSA relapse was 92% at five years and 79% at seven years.
- Relapse-free survival at seven years was 81% for patients in Group 1 and 76% for patients in Group 2.
- Survival at seven years was 93% at five and seven years.
- There were 13 PSA relapses, with two having distant disease but none with a local clinical recurrence.
Comments: These are very impressive results, which suggest that patients who fail radical prostatectomy have an extremely good prognosis with salvage RT and ADT. These results could possibly affect the decision of patients with localized prostate cancer to undergo surgery in preference to RT as primary therapy. If the two treatments initially produce equivalent results, it’s possible that salvage RT after failure of surgery is better than salvage therapy for RT failures
Friday, December 18, 2009
Provenge Trial Sites w/Responsible Individuals
P09-1 (OpenACT - Open-Label Active Cellular ImmunoTherapy)
- Principal Investigator - Chadi Nabhan, M.D.
Institutional Site - Oncology Specialists, S.C., Chicago, IL
Contact Name - Susan Foss, RN
Contact Phone - (847) 268-8576
Contact Email - sfoss@oncmed.net
- Principal Investigator - Myron Murdock, M.D.
Institutional Site - Myron I. Murdock, M.D., LLC, Baltimore, MD
Contact Name - Lori Murrill
Contact Phone - (301) 474-1111
Contact Email - fin0025murdock@yahoo.com
- Principal Investigator - Andrew Armstrong, M.D.
Institutional Site - GU Oncology Research Program, Durham, NC
Contact Name - Karla Morris, RN
Contact Phone - (919) 668-8375
Contact Email - karla.morris@duke.edu
- Principal Investigator - Raymond Lance, M.D.
Institutional Site - Urology of Virginia / Sentara, Norfolk, VA
Contact Name - Jennifer Kucenski
Contact Phone - (757) 457-5123
Contact Email - JEKUCENS@sentara.com
- Principal Investigator - John Corman, M.D.
Institutional Site - Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
Contact Name - Kathryn Dahl, RN
Contact Phone - (206) 341-0578
Contact Email - kathryn.dahl@vmmc.org
- Principal Investigator - Simon Hall, M.D.
Institutional Site - Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
Contact Name - Cynthia Knauer
Contact Phone - (212) 241-8121
Contact Email - Cynthia.Knauer@mountsinai.org
- Principal Investigator - Daniel Petrylak, M.D.
Institutional Site - Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Contact Name - Katherine Resto-Garces
Contact Phone - (212) 305-0546
Contact Email - kr2115@columbia.edu
P07-1 - NeoACT (Neoadjuvant Active Cellular Immunotherapy)
- Principal Investigator - Lawrence Fong, M.D.
Institutional Site - University of California, San Francisco, CA
Contact Name - Julie Russell, RN
Contact Phone - 415-353-7085
Contact Email - julie.russell@ucsfmedctr.orgContact Name - Jay Trovato, RN
Contact Phone - 415-353-9268
Contact Email - jay.trovato@ucsfmedctr.org
- Principal Investigator - John Corman, M.D.
Institutional Site - Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
Contact Name - Kathryn Dahl, RN
Contact Phone - (206) 341-0578
Contact Email - kathryn.dahl@vmmc.org
P07-2 (ProACT — treatment of Prostate cancer with Active Cellular Immunotherapy)
- Principal Investigator - John Corman, M.D.
Institutional Site - Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
Contact Name - Kathryn Dahl, RN
Contact Phone - (206) 341-0578
Contact Email - kathryn.dahl@vmmc.org
Institutional Site - Providence Medical Center, Portland, OR
Contact Name - Theresa Ratzow, RN
Contact Phone - (503) 215-2604
Contact Email - theresa.ratzow@providence.org
TRPM8
- Principal Investigator - Anthony W. Tolcher, M.D., FRCP(C)
Institutional Site - South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics
(START)
Contact Name - Tracy Dufresne, RN, BSN, OCN, CCRP, Physician Referral Coordinator
Contact Phone - 210-593-5265
Contact Fax - 210-593-9828
Contact Email - tracy.dufresne@start.stoh.com
Privacy Policy | Legal Notice
© 2008 Dendreon Corporation. All Rights Reserved. | Home | Site Map | Contact Us |
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Friday, December 11, 2009
Impact of Coparative Effectiveness Research
So far, Congress has considered four comparative effectiveness research (CER) bills in the 111th Congress, and included funding for CER in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (Recovery Act) passed in February 2009. Part of the funding provided in the Recovery Act was used to establish the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research, which issued its first “Report to the President and the Congress” on June 30, 2009. The Council Report defined CER as:
[T]he conduct and synthesis of research comparing the benefits and harms of different interventions and strategies to prevent, diagnose, treat and monitor health conditions in “real world” settings. The purpose of this research is to improve health outcomes by developing and disseminating evidence-based information to patients, clinicians, and other decision-makers, in order to respond to their expressed needs about which interventions are most effective for which patients under specific circumstances.
In order to provide this information, the Report stated that CER must “assess a comprehensive array of health-related outcomes for diverse patient populations and subgroups,” and that the interventions compared “may include medications, procedures, medical and assistive devices and technologies, diagnostic testing, behavioral change, and delivery system strategies.”
It is important to note that the definition provided by the Council includes only clinical comparative effectiveness, without taking into account the costs associated with those treatments. Nevertheless, the provision of funding by the federal government to support this research has led to debate about whether CER should be provided by the federal government and whether CER will in fact affect medical treatment and reduce health care spending. To achieve these changes, “the results of comparative effectiveness analyses would ultimately have to change the behavior of doctors and patients.” It is perhaps this concern — federally-funded health care research intended to affect the behavior of doctors and patients — that have led some to fear that federal government involvement in CER will lead to “government rationing of medical care.”
Rationing care
Possibly in response to such concerns expressed prior to enactment of the Recovery Act, the Recovery Act CER provisions specifically prohibit the Council from mandating “coverage, reimbursement, or other policies for any public or private payer,” and likewise provides that none of the reports or recommendations made by the Council “shall be construed as mandates or clinical guidelines for payment, coverage, or treatment.” Nevertheless, the Report of the Council expresses intent to “provide information that helps clinicians and patients choose which option best fits a patient’s needs and preferences” and to help them determine “which interventions work best for specific types of patients (eg, the elderly, racial and ethnic minorities).”
Providing information to physicians and patients about the comparative effectiveness of certain types of treatments is not, however, the same as mandating clinical decision-making; nor does it necessarily involve requiring or prohibiting coverage by public or private payers of specified treatments analyzed in the CER. As required by the Recovery Act on June 30, 2009, the Institute of Medicine released its recommendations on which study topics related to certain diseases, research methods, and health care models should be priorities for CER funding. The Report notes that although “the overall value of a strategy can be understood best by considering costs and benefits together,” and that “[m]any stakeholders thought CER might persuade payers to support or improve reimbursement for particular services,” the committee “did not discuss leveraging research findings to payment policy.”
However, even if payers were to use CER results to make coverage determinations, it is not clear that these determinations would negatively impact the availability of health care services. Presumably, the coverage determinations would be based on what is “effective,” taking into consideration both cost and clinical effectiveness, rather than making coverage determinations based solely on cost, as insurance companies often do. And, as today, if a patient seeks or a provider recommends a service that is not covered by insurance, the patient may independently pay for that service.
Physicians may want to consider the CER results when making treatment decisions. CER will inform physicians of the many varied treatment options available for particular conditions, and those options that tend to work most effectively with certain patients. CER will not, however, mandate that clinicians follow any specific recommendations, nor will CER prohibit clinicians from utilizing a method or service they deem most suitable, even if that method was deemed “ineffective” by CER.
Jennifer Newberger is an Associate at Arnold & Porter LLP in Washington, DC. Allison Weber Shuren, MSN, JD, assigned, coordinated and edited this article prior to publication. Ms. Shuren may be reached at Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington
Implantable Vaccine Shows Promise
Implantable Cancer Vaccine Shows Promise
Nov. 25 (HealthDay News) -- A cancer vaccine delivered in a fingernail-size implant eliminated melanoma tumors in mice, a new study reports.
The method uses polymer disks, 8.5 millimeters in diameter, that are loaded with tumor-specific antigens and implanted under the skin to reprogram the immune system to attack tumors. The Harvard University scientists who developed the implant predicted that it would be more effective and easier to use than other cancer vaccines currently in clinical trials.
"Inserted anywhere under the skin -- much like the implantable contraceptives that can be placed in a woman's arm -- the implants activate an immune response that destroys tumor cells," David J. Mooney, a bioengineering professor, said in a Harvard news release.
The disks release cytokines, which are powerful recruiters of immune-system messengers called dendritic cells. The cells are able to enter the implant, where they're exposed to antigens specific to the type of tumor being targeted in a particular individual. The dendritic cells then "report" to nearby lymph nodes, where they tell immune system T cells to seek and destroy tumor cells.
Because the method targets only tumor cells, there is no damage to healthy tissue, like there is with chemotherapy, the researchers noted.
The successful test results with mice are reported in the Nov. 25 issue of Science Translational Medicine.
SOURCE: Harvard University, news release, Nov. 25, 2009
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
PSA Velocity >0.4ng/ml per Year and Hi GradePCa
Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
A controversy of current prostate specific antigen based prostate cancer screening is the over detection of potentially insignificant prostate cancer. Because PSA kinetics were previously linked to prostate cancer specific mortality, we determined whether prostate specific antigen velocity is associated with clinically significant prostate cancer.
A total of 1,073 men underwent radical prostatectomy from 1992 to 2008 with data available on prostate specific antigen velocity and tumor volume. Insignificant cancer was defined by the Ohori criteria as organ confined, tumor volume 0.5 cc or less and no primary or secondary Gleason pattern 4 or 5. We calculated the proportion of men with pathologically insignificant prostate cancer stratified by prostate specific antigen velocity.
Preoperative prostate specific antigen velocity greater than 0.4 ng/ml per year was significantly associated with high grade disease (p = 0.008), positive surgical margins (p = 0.003) and seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.007) at radical prostatectomy. Median tumor volume was also significantly higher in men with preoperative prostate specific antigen velocity greater than 0.4 ng/ml per year (3.1 vs 2.4 cc, p = 0.0001). Overall 69 men (6%) met the Ohori criteria for insignificant cancer. Patients with preoperative prostate specific antigen velocity greater than 0.4 ng/ml per year were 50% less likely to have insignificant disease (10% vs 5%, p = 0.003).
A prostate specific antigen velocity threshold of 0.4 ng/ml per year was associated with the likelihood of insignificant prostate cancer. This suggests that prostate specific antigen velocity may be a useful adjunct in prostate cancer screening to increase specificity for identifying patients with clinically significant disease.
Written by:
Loeb S, Roehl KA, Helfand BT, Kan D, Catalona WJ. Are you the author?
Reference:
J Urol. 2009 Nov 12. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.156
Docetaxel and PI-88 , Toxicity Problems
Department of Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney New South Wales Haematology and Oncology Clinics, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Docetaxel (Taxotere) improve survival and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We studied the combination of PI-88, an inhibitor of angiogenesis and heparanase activity, and docetaxel in chemotherapy-naive CRPC.
We conducted a multicentre open-label phase I/II trial of PI-88 in combination with docetaxel. The primary end point was PSA response. Secondary end points included toxicity, radiologic response and overall survival. Doses of PI-88 were escalated to the maximum tolerated dose; whereas docetaxel was given at a fixed 75 mg/m(2) dose every three weeks
Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation component. A further 35 patients were randomly allocated to the study to evaluate the two schedules in phase II trial. The trial was stopped early by the Safety Data Review Board due to a higher-than-expected febrile neutropenia of 27%. In the pooled population, the PSA response (50% reduction) was 70%, median survival was 61 weeks (6-99 weeks) and 1-year survival was 71%.
The regimen of docetaxel and PI-88 is active in CRPC but associated with significant haematologic toxicity. Further evaluation of different scheduling and dosing of PI-88 and docetaxel may be warranted to optimise efficacy with a more manageable safety profile.
Written by:
Khasraw M, Pavlakis N, McCowatt S, Underhill C, Begbie S, de Souza P, Boyce A, Parnis F, Lim V, Harvie R, Marx G. Are you the author?
Undergo TURP to ID Prostate Cancer
Tuesday, 08 December 2009 | |
Department of Urology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy. To evaluate prostate cancer (PCa) detection after repeated negative saturation biopsy, 75 patients, aged 53-78 years, underwent transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) because of persistent suspicion of cancer; median PSA was 11.8 ng ml(-1) and 58 men complained lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). In 12 (16%) and 3 (4%) men a T1a and T1b PCa was found with median PSA and Gleason score equal to 14.2 vs 23.6 ng ml(-1) and 5.6 vs 7 ng ml(-1). In case of persistent suspicion of PCa after repeated negative saturation biopsy, TURP may be proposed, aside from the coexistence of LUTS, to rule out a PCa, in younger patients with high PSA values (>/=20 ng ml(-1)). Written by: |
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services -- Unrestricted
12-08-09
Cancer rates and deaths from the most common forms of the disease are dropping, but not nearly as fast as experts would like.
Incidence decreased about 1 percent a year from 1999 to 2006 and deaths dropped an average of 1.6 percent a year from 2001 to 2006 according to a report released today by the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Cancer Society and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries.
The decreases were driven largely by drops in incidence and death linked to the most common cancers in men and women, including lung, prostate, breast and colorectal. Meanwhile, incidence of some cancers -- including kidney, liver and skin -- has gone up.
"It's very slow. I think the rate is unacceptable. It's a drop in the bucket," said Dr. Michael Caligiuri, director of Ohio State University's Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Take, for instance, colorectal cancer. Only about half of those who should be undergoing colonoscopies actually get them, he said.
Economics explains some of that, but not all, Caligiuri said.
"We need to study this. We need to talk to the people who got it done and talk to the people who didn't get it done and say, 'Why didn't you do this?'
"(Doctors) need to look at ourselves and say 'What are we doing that is preventing these other 50 percent from not getting screening?' "
Better screening and wider-spread use of optimal treatment could drive down colorectal cancer death rates much more significantly, according to the report written by Brenda Edwards of the NCI's surveillance research program.
In terms of what individuals can do, much attention in this report -- and in the field of cancer research overall -- is given to lifestyle changes, particularly reduction in obesity. Being overweight or obese is thought to contribute to a variety of cancers, including colon.
After decades of efforts to lower tobacco use, Edwards points out, reductions in lung cancer incidence have been seen.
Also yesterday, a group of experts spoke about cancer prevention efforts as part of the American Association for Cancer Research conference on the topic in Houston.
"Diet is one of those relatively few modifiable risk factors that is associated with a change in cancer incidence and tumor behavior," said John Milner, chief of the National Cancer Institute's nutritional science research group.
Thirty percent of cancers are related to dietary habits, he said.
"There's a lot we can do to prevent cancer as we become more fit and turn around the obesity epidemic," said Dr. Tim Byers, associate dean of the Colorado School of Public Health and interim director of the Colorado Cancer Center.
In addition to looking at the connection between weight and cancer, there is a lot of focus on specific dietary compounds and how they influence cancer incidence.
"There's probably not enough fish in the sea for all of us to eat as much fish as we should get," said Elaine Hardman, associate professor of medicine at Marshall University School of Medicine.
Much of Hardman's work focuses on fats found in fish and nuts.
The good news: the fats found in fish originate in plants, said Hardman, who has studied mice that are fed canola oil.
Some research is even pointing to a connection between the nutrients absorbed before birth and subsequent cancer susceptibility, she said. To see more of The Columbus Dispatch, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.columbusdispatch.com. Copyright (c) 2009, The Columbus Dispatch, Ohio Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.
All Contents Copyright © 1995-2009 Life Extension Foundation All rights reserved. | ![]() |
These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. These |
Sunday, December 6, 2009
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 2:59 AM
Subject: [PPML] Serial biopsies are associated with an increased risk of ED
in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
>J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2664-9.
>
> Serial prostate biopsies are associated with an increased risk of erectile
> dysfunction in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
>
> Fujita K, Landis P, McNeil BK, Pavlovich CP.
>
> Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
> Maryland 21224, USA.
>
> PURPOSE: We determined whether serial prostate needle biopsies predispose
> men to erectile dysfunction and/or lower urinary tract symptoms over time.
> MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with prostate cancer on an active surveillance
> protocol were administered the 5-item Sexual Health Inventory for Men and
> International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaires on protocol entry, and
> at a cross-sectional point in 2008. All men had at least 1, 10 to 12-core
> prostate biopsy at protocol entry and yearly surveillance biopsies
> thereafter were recommended. RESULTS: Of 333 men 231 returned the followup
> questionnaires. Correlations were found between biopsy number and erectile
> dysfunction, with increasing biopsy number associated with a decrease in
> Sexual Health Inventory for Men score (p = 0.04) and a history of 3 or
> more biopsies associated with a greater decrease in Sexual Health
> Inventory for Men score than after 2 or fewer biopsies (p = 0.02).
> Multivariable analysis for biopsy number, age, prostate volume and
> prostate specific antigen showed that only biopsy number was associated
> with decreasing Sexual Health Inventory for Men score (p = 0.02). When men
> were stratified by baseline Sexual Health Inventory for Men, those without
> preexisting erectile dysfunction (Sexual Health Inventory for Men score 22
> to 25) trended toward steeper decreases in Sexual Health Inventory for Men
> score after 3 or more biopsies (p = 0.06) than did men with baseline mild
> to moderate erectile dysfunction (Sexual Health Inventory for Men score 8
> to 21). No correlation was found between biopsy number and International
> Prostate Symptom Score. CONCLUSIONS: Serial prostate biopsies appear to
> have an adverse effect on erectile function in men with prostate cancer on
> active surveillance but do not affect lower urinary tract symptoms.
>
> best
> Jacquie Strax
> http://www.psa-rising.com
>
Friday, December 4, 2009
Low and High Fat Diets, Differences
Thursday, 03 December 2009 | |
Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System; Department of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. A high fat Western diet and sedentary lifestyle may predispose men to prostate cancer through changes in serum hormones and growth factors. We evaluated the effect of a low fat diet on serum factors affecting prostate cancer cell growth by performing a prospective, randomized dietary intervention trial in men with prostate cancer. We randomized 18 men with prostate cancer who did not receive prior therapy to a low fat (15% kcal), high fiber, soy protein supplemented diet or a Western (40% kcal fat) diet for 4 weeks. Fasting serum was collected at baseline and after the intervention to measure prostate specific antigen, sex hormones, insulin, insulin-like growth factor I and II, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins, lipids and fatty acids. LNCaP cells (ATCC(R)) were cultured in medium containing pre-intervention and post-intervention human serum to assess the in vitro effect of the diet on prostate cancer cell proliferation. Subjects in each group were highly compliant with the dietary intervention. Serum from men in the low fat group significantly decreased the growth of LNCaP cells relative to Western diet serum (p = 0.03). There were no significant between group changes in serum prostate specific antigen, sex hormones, insulin, insulin-like growth factor I and II, and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Serum triglyceride and linoleic acid (omega-6) levels were decreased in the low fat group (p = 0.034 and 0.005, respectively). Correlation analysis revealed that decreased omega-6 and increased omega-3 fatty acid correlated with decreased serum stimulated LNCaP cell growth (r = 0.64, p = 0.004 and r = -0.49, p = 0.04, respectively). In this prospective, randomized dietary intervention trial a low fat diet resulted in changes in serum fatty acid levels that were associated with decreased human LNCaP cancer cell growth. Further prospective trials are indicated to evaluate the potential of low fat diets for prostate cancer prevention and treatment. Written by: |
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Treatment of Estrogen Deficiency after HT
Tuesday, 01 December 2009 | |
Department of Surgery (Urology), Durham VA Medical Center and Duke Prostate Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA. steve.freedland@duke.edu This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer and is increasingly used to treat asymptomatic patients with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after failed primary therapy. Although effective, ADT is associated with multiple adverse effects, many of which are related to the estrogen deficiency that occurs as a result of treatment. These include increased fracture risk, hot flashes, gynecomastia, serum lipid changes and memory loss. By providing clinicians with a greater awareness of the estrogen deficiency induced adverse effects from ADT, they can proactively intervene on the physical and psychological impact these effects have on patients. Written by: |
Value of Saturation Biopsies
Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects - Abstract | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
Tuesday, 01 December 2009 | |
Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France. Since its introduction, ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy has undergone significant evolution. Because of the low sensitivity of ultrasonography in detecting prostate cancer, tissue is sampled randomly within the gland. In an attempt to enhance cancer detection and characterization, the trend has been to increase the number of biopsy cores taken. Saturation biopsies of the prostate gland were first evaluated as a diagnostic tool. When performed as an initial procedure, saturation biopsies do not seem to improve cancer detection when compared to standard biopsy. However, saturation biopsies might be of clinical value in patients with previous negative standard biopsies but persistently rising PSA levels. As a staging tool, the use of saturation biopsies was proposed mainly to avoid overtreatment of clinically insignificant cancers. Results from clinical and autopsy studies have suggested that saturation biopsies are more accurate than standard biopsies in histological characterization of prostate cancer. Improving cancer characterization might require an increase in the number of cores taken, but knowing their precise location is paramount. Strict template guidance and three-dimensional techniques offer a more comprehensive approach than current ultrasound-guided approaches, and the advantage of precisely recording every core location. New imaging techniques, such as diffusion-weighted and spectroscopic MRI might also help in targeting prostate biopsies. Written by: |
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Randomized Trials of Prostate Cancer Screening |
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Some basic criteria (see link below for the full list) for being considered include having:
Metastatic disease
Castrate-resistant prostate cancer (this means men who no longer respond to surgical or medical castration, such as hormone therapy)
PSA of at least 5.0 ng/mL
Castrate level of testosterone (less than 50 ng/dL) achieved via medical or surgical castration
Life expectancy of at least 3 months
Adequate hematologic, renal and liver function
No lung, liver, or brain metastases
It must also be at least 28 days since a man has: used systemic corticosteroids (use of inhaled, intranasal, intra-articular, and topical steroids is acceptable, as is a short course (ie, less than or equal to 1 day) of corticosteroids to prevent a reaction to the IV contrast used for CT scans); used non-steroidal anti-androgens (eg, bicalutamide, flutamide, or nilutamide); had external beam radiation therapy or major surgery requiring general anesthetic; had any other systemic therapy for prostate cancer including secondary hormonal therapies, such as megestrol acetate (Megace), diethylstilbestrol (DES), and ketoconazole; received chemotherapy; or had treatment with any other investigational product.
Monday, November 23, 2009
Amercican Urologicall Assn Guidancw on Acewwning
The American Urological Association (AUA) and the AUA Foundation believe that early detection of and risk assessment for prostate cancer should be offered to asymptomatic men 40 years of age or older who have a life expectancy of at least 10 years. Men who wish to be screened should have both a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and a digital rectal exam (DRE). This program will provide information to learn more about the pros and cons of prostate screening. Program Objectives: 1 Discuss prostate screening and common prostate conditions 2 Identify current AUA recommendations for prostate screening-PSA and DRE tests 3 Describe the role of the following factors in prostate screening:
5 Identify questions to ask health care providers regarding individual prostate screening benefits and risks Participants in the live program will have an opportunity to present questions to the speaker panelat the conclusion of the program. This forum will be recorded for future online viewing. Meeting Organizer/Moderator: Stephanie Chisolm, PhD, AUA Foundation Mark your calendar for future Webinars in the series: Living with Prostatitis Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8-9:30 p.m. ET Featured Medical Expert: Anthony Schaeffer, MD, Feinberg School of Medicine,Northwestern University, Chicago, IL Enlarged Prostate or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Tuesday, September 22, 2009 8-9:30 p.m. ET Featured Medical Expert: Claus Roehrborn, MD, Department Head of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, TX, and member of the AUA Guidelines Panel for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia |
Friday, November 20, 2009
More Information on Vitamin D Resuts
I know I sound like a broken record and you may tire of my beating the drum for vitamin D But maybe this is my one good deed in life...I hope staying alive is not off topic for some groups.
Henry
November 17, 2009
Heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and premature death all linked to insufficient vitamin D levels
The
results of a study presented on November 16, 2009 at the American Heart
Association's Scientific Conference in Orlando, Florida, confirmed a
strong association between the presence of reduced vitamin D levels and
a greater risk of coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure and
dying over follow-up in men and women 50 years of age and older.
Brent
Muhlestein, MD and his colleagues at Intermountain Medical Center in
Salt Lake City followed 27,686 subjects with no history of heart
disease for an average of 1.2 years. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels
obtained during routine clinical care were classified as normal at over
30 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL), low at between 15 to 30 ng/mL or
very low at less than 15 ng/mL.
Over
the follow-up period, 2,614 participants developed coronary artery
disease, 1,742 developed heart failure, 314 experienced a stroke and
1,193 deaths occurred. Those with very low vitamin D levels were 45
percent likelier to develop heart disease, twice as likely to develop
heart failure, 78 percent more likely to experience a stroke,and 77
percent likelier to die than those with normal levels. Subjects whose
vitamin D levels were classified as "low" as opposed to "very low" also
had greater risks of these conditions, however, the increase compared
to those with normal levels was not as great as the very low group.
"This
was a unique study because the association between Vitamin D deficiency
and cardiovascular disease has not been well-established," commented Dr
Muhlestein, who is the director of cardiovascular research of
Intermountain Medical Center's Heart Institute. "Its conclusions about
how we can prevent disease and provide treatment may ultimately help us
save more lives."
"Utah's
population gave us a unique pool of patients whose health histories are
different than patients in previous studies," he remarked. "For
example, because of Utah's low use of tobacco and alcohol, we were able
to narrow the focus of the study to the effects of vitamin D on the
cardiovascular system."
"We
concluded that among patients 50 years of age or older, even a moderate
deficiency of Vitamin D levels was associated with developing coronary
artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and death," noted coauthor Heidi
May, PhD, MS, who is an epidemiologist with the Intermountain Medical
Center research team. "This is important because vitamin D deficiency
is easily treated. If increasing levels of vitamin D can decrease some
risk associated with these cardiovascular diseases, it could have a
significant public health impact. When you consider that cardiovascular
disease is the leading cause of death in America, you understand how
this research can help improve the length and quality of people's
lives."
"We
believe the findings are important enough to now justify randomized
treatment trials of supplementation in patients , Vitamin D
deficiency to determine for sure whether it can reduce the risk of
heart disease," Dr Muhlestein added.
Jim Mcguiness, Man to Man,Melbourne, FL
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Prostate Forum Announcement
Dear Prostate Forum Subscriber,
We're working on an upcoming issue of Prostate Forum that focuses on
readers' questions about active surveillance, commonly called watchful
waiting. If you've got a question about active surveillance, please submit
it via our website at http://www.prostateforum.com/ask-dr-myers.html or
e-mail me directly at jessica@prostateforum.com
Keep in mind that the way you ask your question is essential. If you¹re
asking about your own cancer, and not, for example, why Dr. Myers suggests
prostate cancer patients avoid flaxseed, he needs enough information about
your specific case to address it in an informative manner. Specifically, he
needs to know what kind of prostate cancer you have and how extensive that
cancer was at diagnosis. He also needs to know about each treatment in
detail and what that treatment did to your PSA or other evidence of disease.
As you formulate your questions, please be sure to include as much of the
following as possible:
* What was your PSA at diagnosis and how fast was that PSA increasing?
* What was your Gleason on biopsy?
* For all patients, PSA doubling time is very, very important. Please
estimate or provide Dr. Myers with a series of PSA levels so he can
calculate.
* Please mention if you have any other medical problems such as heart
disease.
Best,
Jessica Myers-Schecter
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
News You Can Use, UsTOO International
- MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROSTATE SURGERY MAY HAVE PROS AND CONS
CancerConsultants.com, 10/15/2009
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, a less invasive surgical procedure that has gained in popularity in recent years, appears to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer blood transfusions, and fewer postoperative respiratory complications than open, retropubic radical prostatectomy, but higher rates of incontinence and erectile dysfunction. These results were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. - ADDITION OF ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY IMPROVES SURVIVAL WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER
CancerConsultants.com, 10/08/2009
In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, the addition of androgen deprivation therapy to radiation therapy improves overall and progression-free survival without substantially affecting cardiovascular mortality. These results, based on close to 10 years of follow-up, were presented at a European cancer conference. - HORMONE THERAPY IN PROSTATE CANCER INCREASES RISK OF HEART DISEASE
CancerConsultants.com, 10/06/2009
Hormone therapy used to treat men with advanced prostate cancer may lead to an increased risk of heart disease, according to the results of a study presented on September 22, 2009 at Europe’s largest cancer congress, ECCO 15-ESMO 34, in Berlin.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Importance of Vitamin D to Men & Womens Health
Most on this list have already come to these conclusions and along with Dr. Cannell of VitaminDcouncil.org believe that the only way to know what your serum vitamin D is a blood test. That being said I for the life of me can not understand why people on their own won't fork out the $30 to get the vitamin D test done on their own. I have even offered to pay for the test on a bet that if they are above 50 ng/ml I pay - below they pay. I get responses like I have a physical next July I'll as the doctor what he thinks. My wife says I'm too pushy. Oh Well I try.
Heart and Bone Damage from Low Vitamin D Tied to Declines in Sex Hormones
15 November 2009 Filed under Heart health, Hormones, Osteoporosis, Vitamin D Posted by admin » No Comments
Researchers at Johns Hopkins are reporting what is believed to be the first conclusive evidence in men that the long-term ill effects of vitamin D deficiency are amplified by lower levels of the key sex hormone estrogen, but not testosterone.
In a national study in 1010 men, to be presented Nov. 15 at the American Heart Association’s (AHA) annual Scientific Sessions in Orlando, researchers say the new findings build on previous studies showing that deficiencies in vitamin D and low levels of estrogen, found naturally in differing amounts in men and women, were independent risk factors for hardened and narrowed arteries and weakened bones. Vitamin D is an essential part to keeping the body healthy, and can be obtained from fortified foods, such as milk and cereals, and by exposure to sunlight.
“Our results confirm a long-suspected link and suggest that vitamin D supplements, which are already prescribed to treat osteoporosis, may also be useful in preventing heart disease,” says lead study investigator and cardiologist Erin Michos, M.D., M.H.S.
“All three steroid hormones – vitamin D, estrogen and testosterone – are produced from cholesterol, whose blood levels are known to influence arterial and bone health,” says Michos, an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and its Heart and Vascular Institute. “Our study gives us a much better understanding of how the three work in concert to affect cardiovascular and bone health.”
Michos says the overall biological relationship continues to puzzle scientists because studies of the long-term effects of adding estrogen in the form of hormone replacement therapy in women failed to show fewer deaths from heart disease. Indeed, results showed that in some women, an actual increase in heart disease and stroke rates occurred, although, bone fractures declined.
The Hopkins team’s latest data were provided by analyzing blood samples from a subset of men participating in a study on cancer. That study was part of a larger, ongoing national health survey involving both men and women and was designed to compare the risk of diseases between those with the lowest blood levels of vitamin D to those with higher amounts. An unhealthy deficiency, experts say, is considered blood levels of 20 nanograms per milliliter or lower.
The men in the study had their hormone levels measured for both chemical forms of testosterone and estrogen found in blood, when each is either unattached or circulating freely, and when each is attached to a separate protein, known as sex hormone binding globulin, or SHBG for short.
Initial results showed no link between vitamin D deficiency and depressed blood levels of either hormone. And despite finding a harmful relationship between depressed testosterone levels and rates of heart disease, stroke, and high blood pressure, as well as osteopenia in men, researchers found that it was independent of deficiencies in vitamin D.
However, when researchers compared ratios of estrogen to SHBG levels, they found that rates of both diseases, especially osteopenia, the early stage of osteoporosis, were higher when both estrogen and vitamin D levels were depressed.
For every single unit decrease in ratios of estrogen to SHBG (both in nanomoles per liter), men low in vitamin D showed an 89 percent increase in osteopenia, but men with sufficient vitamin D levels had a less worrisome 64 percent jump.
Using the same measure of estrogen levels, men low in vitamin D were also at heightened risk of cardiovascular diseases, at 12 percent, compared to men with adequate levels of the vitamin, at 1 percent, numbers that researchers say are still statistically significant.
“These results reinforce the message of how important proper quantities of vitamin D are to good bone health, and that a man’s risk of developing osteoporosis and heart disease is heavily weighted on the complex and combined interaction of how any such vitamin deficits interact with both their sex hormones, in particular, estrogen,” Michos says.
Michos and her team next plan to analyze blood samples from women to see if the same results from men hold true.
Michos recommends that men and women boost their vitamin D levels by eating diets rich in fatty fish, such as cod, sardines and mackerel, consuming fortified dairy products, taking vitamin supplements, and in warmer weather briefly exposing skin to the sun’s vitamin-D producing ultraviolet light.
She points out that clinical trials are under way to determine whether or not vitamin D supplements can prevent incidents of or deaths from heart attack, stroke and other signs of cardiovascular disease.
The U.S. Institute of Medicine suggests that an adequate daily intake of vitamin D is between 200 and 400 international units, but Michos feels this is inadequate to achieve optimal nutrient blood levels (above 30 nanograms per milliliter). Previous results from the same nationwide survey showed that 41 percent of men and 53 percent of women are technically deficient in the nutrient, with vitamin D levels below 28 nanograms per milliliter.
Funding for this study was provided by the Hormone Demonstration Project, a part of the Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund Research Grant Program at the Johns Hopkins University. Additional support was provided by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and a Clinician Scientist Award at the Johns Hopkins University.
Besides Michos, other researchers at Johns Hopkins involved in this study were Jared Reis, Ph.D.; and Meredith Shields and Elizabeth Platz, Ph.D., Sc.D., at the University’s School of Public Health; and Sabine Rohrmann, now at the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg. Another investigator in this research was Nader Rifai, Ph.D., at Children’s Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School.